JukePop Serials rolled out a new feature a few weeks ago: reviews, which allow readers to leave star ratings and a critique of their favorite web serials’ chapters.

The feature is sort of a no-brainer as far as implementing a means for author feedback goes. With the star ratings, readers express their overall feelings on the chapter, and with the comment attached to the rating, they tell the author why. The site uses a voting feature to determine the top serials–but with ratings, JP seems to be aiming for a means of separating highly voted serials (popular serials) with highly-rated serials (critically acclaimed).

Now, for those who don’t know, rating systems have a history of becoming skewed by fans of the work being rated on. Fans tend to overlook the flaws and drop 5 stars, a “That was awesome!” comment, and leave. Crowd mentality. Rare is the actual critique in which a (in this case) reader tells the author what they thought while reading, what they liked, what they disliked, and what they wish would be changed. Newgrounds is full of people like this.

Some authors are okay with that. I’m not.

Chasing Innocence by Curtis Han, the first serial I swung the critic hammer on.

These reviews are in no way helpful to the author, except as a means for boosting their confidence. I’m all for boosting confidence, but what price is paid when the work actually needs significant improvement, and no one is willing to tell the author? It is, in a word, a form of dishonesty. Dishonest praise leads to false confidence, which is nothing but a slap in the face to the hard-working writer who mustered up the courage to put their work out in the first place.

It’s a bigger slap in the face than a negative review.

I find myself in a precarious position when leaving reviews on JukePop. I’m an author myself–these people are my competitors for a $500 cash prize. The strategic thing to do would be to leave low star ratings on other people’s work, wouldn’t it? Or at the very least, not leave five-star ratings. I’ve already turned off auto-vote and stopped voting up other serials, though I still share my fellow authors’ chapter releases in the interest of promoting the site itself, which is relatively new. Why not go the whole way and leave bad reviews?

This is the impression my fellow authors probably get every time I do leave a bad review. That I’m gaming them. Sometimes I wish JP would disable the reviewing option for authors altogether, just to tie my hands together and stop me from committing presentational suicide.

And yet… Who benefits when I refuse to tell an author when their work needs improvement? No one benefits. Who is hurt by the serial’s low quality? JukePop itself.

Imagine a site full of ambition but equally full of mediocre content. Low grammar standards. Poor pacing. Plot holes and punctuation errors galore. Would you like to go there? Me neither.

Black Hearts by R. Blackwell. Am I crazy for giving it 5 stars?

Look, I come from the forum scene, where people are blunt about what they think of your work and unapologetic about it. I remember when The Super Police first took off on my old writing forum; it quickly became the most popular serial there, but in the beginning, everyone had something bad to say about it.

So is it a comet, or a meteor?

Who the hell takes a phone call from aliens seriously?

Why are the main characters moving on from their parents’ deaths so quickly?

Why isn’t he testing out his super powers?

What’s with the character dump in that last chapter?

Why is the government talking about bullshit?

The author took the blows. He listened to the feedback, defended himself as much as possible, then moved on to the next chapter. And the next. And the next. (To be fair, he had already written the entire story in his native language, and was only releasing them on the board just to get the English translation out there.)

You know what happened? Everyone kept reading. Everyone started to like it. And in the end, we could look past the flaws and say with certainty that this serial had some solid damn high potential. The craze died down, we all scattered, disinterested in the next couple of serials, and then… The author cranked out another season of the serial.

And wow. The Super Police: The X-Mafia, was a thrill ride.

Still with flaws, sure. We gladly pointed them out. But not nearly as many as the first season–because the author had done something different: he’d shifted focus from the things we didn’t like to the things we did.

I want everyone on JukePop to be like that. To understand that it’s okay to put out sub-par work, but to expect criticism. Lots of criticism. And then keep putting out their work, making it better along the way. I’d like to instill those values by leaving those dirty, uncompromising reviews myself, whatever backlash I may receive from other authors socially or whichever hearts may get broken.

I want to stop here and point out that the quality of most of the serials on the site is actually pretty high! There are gems EVERYWHERE, which is exactly what JP needs as a new site and a new reading experience. We authors, the JP pioneers, have to set the bar high for those who will follow and establish the site as the number one place on the web for genre fiction and web serials from the offset. Thus, reviewing is our responsibility.

So that’s my reason for leaving reviews on JukePop. What’s yours?


8 thoughts on “Why I Review My Fellow Authors’ Works on Jukepop Serials

  1. Very eloquently stated Kevin!

    Since you are talking about feedback, the only critique I can suggest of your review is to change ‘payed’ to ‘paid’. Glad to see your writing is flawed; however, minor it may be – you are human and not android.

    Looking forward to more posts.

    1. *facepalm* Caught red-handed!

      I forgot to mention just how flawed my own work is and how much I would appreciate constructive feedback myself. Another time.

      Thanks for reading!

  2. Great thoughts on this. I’m actually hesitant on leaving reviews simply because if I leave a bad review for a serial that’s right below Radio Silence, it may seem that I’m trying to put them down before they get ahead of me. Or if I put a bad review of a serial that’s ahead of me, it may look like I’m being petty.

    However, this post has given me food for thought, and I may reconsider my policy on reviews. Awesome post.

  3. Thanks for the honest and thought provoking article, Kevin. I completely agree with you, and I too welcome all kinds of feedback. In fact, it’s really only the negative or constructive feedback that writers learn from. That’s not to say that a good pat on the back isn’t appreciated, because it is. We all need to know what we’re doing right, but we really need to know where our readers think we need improvement. As long as reviews are constructive and focus on the work and don’t slam the author, I’m all for a good constructive review.

    Hopefully JukePop will continue to produce and nurture a critical audience that isn’t afraid to tell authors what they really think. Negative feedback doesn’t have to be a bad thing. If done properly and with respect, it can be a valuable tool and a bridge between the writer and their audience.

    Thanks again,

  4. Nicely put. I appreciate your point of view. As I am using JukePop as a forum to learn to write a novel, I wish honest feedback and constructive criticism was more common.

  5. While I agree with most of your points, I do wish there was a way to submit critiques other than posting a review.

    Hmm, maybe using the new edit function would be a good idea.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s